Natural Rights Theories¶
Tuck, R. (1979). Natural Rights Theories: Their Origin and Development. Cambridge University Press.
Cited by¶
1 citation across 1 artifact.
Each citation links to the sentence it supports in the citing article.
Primes¶
- Anachronism
- T3 — Accessibility vs. rigor trade-off. As Tuck (1979) demonstrates in his genealogy of natural-rights theories, strict anti-anachronism in popular history produces unreadable prose (because modern readers lack the vocabulary of the depicted period).
This sourceGenealogy carefully dating the emergence of modern rights concepts (Gerson, Grotius, Selden, Hobbes) to prevent anachronistic back-projection — supports the accessibility-vs-rigor tension (D40-075).
- T3 — Accessibility vs. rigor trade-off. As Tuck (1979) demonstrates in his genealogy of natural-rights theories, strict anti-anachronism in popular history produces unreadable prose (because modern readers lack the vocabulary of the depicted period).
Verification¶
Does it exist? Not checked yet. This entry carries no identifier to resolve. It was extracted from the citation as written in the article, normalized, and deduplicated against the rest of the registry.
Does it back the claim? Not recorded. The single citation of this work carries no recorded support check.
Support is checked per citation rather than per work — the same source can be cited soundly in one article and wrongly in another. Per-citation recording began recently, so a citation with no recorded check is a gap in the record rather than evidence it went unchecked.
See how references were verified.
Registry ID ref:4c2335be8b7b · see in the full table