Semantic Leaps¶
Coulson, S. (2001). Semantic Leaps: Frame-Shifting and Conceptual Blending in Meaning Construction. Cambridge University Press.
Cited by¶
1 citation across 1 artifact.
Each citation links to the sentence it supports in the citing article.
Primes¶
- Conceptual Blending
- There is no internal mark in the blend itself that identifies it as creative vs. misleading. Common failure mode: Celebrating a blend as innovative without checking whether it licenses false inferences (a design blend that projects incompatible constraints from both inputs); treating all metaphorical blends as equivalent despite vast differences in their inferential validity; educators or scientists using pedagogical blends that later require unlearning because they are structurally convenient but factually wrong.
This sourceExperimental/psycholinguistic account of frame-shifting and blending as online meaning construction; distinguishes blending from metaphor with linguistic evidence. PARTIALLY SUPPORTS marker 185 — the marker sits on 'educators or scientists using pedagogical blends that later require unlearning because they are structurally convenient but factually wrong'; the book grounds blending-as-online-construction and false-inference risk but does not make the specific pedagogical-unlearning claim. DOI verified. See flag.
- There is no internal mark in the blend itself that identifies it as creative vs. misleading. Common failure mode: Celebrating a blend as innovative without checking whether it licenses false inferences (a design blend that projects incompatible constraints from both inputs); treating all metaphorical blends as equivalent despite vast differences in their inferential validity; educators or scientists using pedagogical blends that later require unlearning because they are structurally convenient but factually wrong.
Verification¶
Does it exist? Confirmed. This work's DOI resolves to a registered record, which fixes its identity. That is all it fixes.
Does it back the claim? Not recorded. The single citation of this work carries no recorded support check.
Support is checked per citation rather than per work — the same source can be cited soundly in one article and wrongly in another. Per-citation recording began recently, so a citation with no recorded check is a gap in the record rather than evidence it went unchecked.
See how references were verified.
Registry ID ref:4ca99d5f2cb8 · see in the full table