Incentives build robustness in BitTorrent¶
Cohen, B. (2003). Incentives build robustness in BitTorrent. Proceedings of the 1st Workshop on Economics of Peer-to-Peer Systems, 68-72.
Cited by¶
2 citations across 2 artifacts.
Each citation links to the sentence it supports in the citing article.
Primes¶
- Cooperation
- Computer science: distributed consensus protocols, peer-to-peer file sharing, and blockchain validation, where nodes must contribute resources for system benefit while protocol design penalizes those who only consume.
This sourceShows the BitTorrent tit-for-tat 'choking' mechanism rewards contributing peers and penalizes free-riders (leechers), engineering cooperation among self-interested nodes.
- Computer science: distributed consensus protocols, peer-to-peer file sharing, and blockchain validation, where nodes must contribute resources for system benefit while protocol design penalizes those who only consume.
Domain-specific¶
Verification¶
Does it exist? Not checked yet. This entry carries no identifier to resolve. It was extracted from the citation as written in the article, normalized, and deduplicated against the rest of the registry.
Does it back the claim? Not recorded. Neither this nor any other of the 2 citations of this work carries a recorded support check.
Support is checked per citation rather than per work — the same source can be cited soundly in one article and wrongly in another. Per-citation recording began recently, so a citation with no recorded check is a gap in the record rather than evidence it went unchecked.
See how references were verified.
Links previously used in the corpus¶
Before the registry existed this work was also linked 1 other way.
Registry ID ref:4d251b87a2b9 · see in the full table