Telecommunications Act of 1996¶
(1996). Telecommunications Act of 1996.
Cited by¶
1 citation across 1 artifact.
Each citation links to the sentence it supports in the citing article.
Primes¶
- Last-Mile Failure
- Telecom's recognition that last-mile economics defeat market provision led to universal-service funds and line-sharing rules
This sourceEstablishes the federal Universal Service Fund and the principle that last-mile economics defeating market provision require cross-subsidy; the Act (§ 251) also mandates unbundled access / line-sharing as the regulatory response to incumbent control of the local loop.
Supported in partVerified against the work's full text
Section 254 creates universal-service support mechanisms for rural and high-cost areas; it does not state the last-mile rationale or cover line-sharing.
“Consumers in all regions of the Nation, including low-income consumers and those in rural, insular, and high cost areas, should have access to telecommunications and information services”
- Telecom's recognition that last-mile economics defeat market provision led to universal-service funds and line-sharing rules
Verification¶
Does it exist? Not checked yet. This entry carries no identifier to resolve. It was extracted from the citation as written in the article, normalized, and deduplicated against the rest of the registry.
Does it back the claim? Read against the text for 1 of 1 citation: 1 supported in part. Each verdict is shown under its citation below, with what in the work backs the sentence.
Support is checked per citation rather than per work — the same source can be cited soundly in one article and wrongly in another. Per-citation recording began recently, so a citation with no recorded check is a gap in the record rather than evidence it went unchecked.
See how references were verified.
Registry ID ref:4dec103f60f0 · see in the full table