Introduction to Higher-Order Categorical Logic¶
Lambek, J., & Scott, P. J. (1986). Introduction to Higher-Order Categorical Logic. Cambridge University Press.
Cited by¶
2 citations across 2 artifacts.
Each citation links to the sentence it supports in the citing article.
Primes¶
- Category
- Workflow and process modelling. Process states as objects and transitions as arrows; the composition of transitions is the workflow's algebra, and consistency requirements on transformations become composition-preservation conditions. Logic. Propositions as objects and proofs as arrows (the proofs-as-programs / Curry–Howard reading), with proof composition as arrow composition.
This sourceEstablishes the propositions-as-objects, proofs-as-arrows reading and the Curry–Howard / categorical-logic correspondence.
- Workflow and process modelling. Process states as objects and transitions as arrows; the composition of transitions is the workflow's algebra, and consistency requirements on transformations become composition-preservation conditions. Logic. Propositions as objects and proofs as arrows (the proofs-as-programs / Curry–Howard reading), with proof composition as arrow composition.
Domain-specific¶
Verification¶
Does it exist? Not checked yet. This entry carries no identifier to resolve. It was extracted from the citation as written in the article, normalized, and deduplicated against the rest of the registry.
Does it back the claim? Not recorded. Neither this nor any other of the 2 citations of this work carries a recorded support check.
Support is checked per citation rather than per work — the same source can be cited soundly in one article and wrongly in another. Per-citation recording began recently, so a citation with no recorded check is a gap in the record rather than evidence it went unchecked.
See how references were verified.
Registry ID ref:4e7045492947 · see in the full table