Effect of Computerized Physician Order Entry and a Team Intervention on Prevention of Serious Medication Errors¶
Bates, D. W. (1998). Effect of Computerized Physician Order Entry and a Team Intervention on Prevention of Serious Medication Errors. JAMA.
Cited by¶
1 citation across 1 artifact.
Each citation links to the sentence it supports in the citing article.
Domain-specific¶
- Medication Error
- The contemporary intervention vocabulary — computerised provider order entry, barcode medication administration, closed-loop dispensing, high-alert medication lists, clinical pharmacy reconciliation, renal-function dose adjustment at the prescribing step — each strengthens a specific stage, and the landmark evaluations measured what still got through: Bates and colleagues' 1998 study of computerised order entry counted serious medication errors not intercepted before reaching the patient, and found them down 55%
This sourceBates and colleagues' evaluation of computerised physician order entry, which counted serious medication errors not intercepted before reaching the patient and found a 55% reduction.
Supported in partVerified against the source
- The contemporary intervention vocabulary — computerised provider order entry, barcode medication administration, closed-loop dispensing, high-alert medication lists, clinical pharmacy reconciliation, renal-function dose adjustment at the prescribing step — each strengthens a specific stage, and the landmark evaluations measured what still got through: Bates and colleagues' 1998 study of computerised order entry counted serious medication errors not intercepted before reaching the patient, and found them down 55%
Verification¶
Does it exist? Confirmed. This work's DOI resolves to a registered record, which fixes its identity. That is all it fixes.
Does it back the claim? Read against the text for 1 of 1 citation: 1 supported in part. Each verdict is shown under its citation below, with what in the work backs the sentence.
Support is checked per citation rather than per work — the same source can be cited soundly in one article and wrongly in another. Per-citation recording began recently, so a citation with no recorded check is a gap in the record rather than evidence it went unchecked.
See how references were verified.
Registry ID ref:4ed6d6934028 · see in the full table