Meat Is Good to Taboo: Dietary Proscriptions as a Product of the Interaction of Psychological Mechanisms and Social Processes¶
Fessler, D. M. T., & Navarrete, C. D. (2003). Meat Is Good to Taboo: Dietary Proscriptions as a Product of the Interaction of Psychological Mechanisms and Social Processes: Dietary Proscriptions as a Product of the Interaction of Psychological Mechanisms and Social Processes. Journal of Cognition and Culture, 3(1), 1-40.
Cited by¶
1 citation across 1 artifact.
Each citation links to the sentence it supports in the citing article.
Primes¶
- Overton Window
- In dietary norms, it is the foods a culture treats as edible or appropriate, with raw fish, insects, and organ meats moving in or out over decades.
This sourceDietary acceptability as a culturally variable, shifting band — which foods (organ meats, insects, raw fish) count as edible/appropriate is socially constructed and moves over time.
- In dietary norms, it is the foods a culture treats as edible or appropriate, with raw fish, insects, and organ meats moving in or out over decades.
Verification¶
Does it exist? Not confirmed. The DOI recorded for this work did not resolve when it was last checked, so it is shown above but not linked. The citation may still be sound; the recorded identifier is not. Flagged for repair.
Does it back the claim? Not recorded. The single citation of this work carries no recorded support check.
Support is checked per citation rather than per work — the same source can be cited soundly in one article and wrongly in another. Per-citation recording began recently, so a citation with no recorded check is a gap in the record rather than evidence it went unchecked.
See how references were verified.
Registry ID ref:4f16aa57f815 · see in the full table