Meat Is Good to Taboo: Dietary Proscriptions as a Product of the Interaction of Psychological Mechanisms and Social Processes

Fessler, D. M. T., & Navarrete, C. D. (2003). Meat Is Good to Taboo: Dietary Proscriptions as a Product of the Interaction of Psychological Mechanisms and Social Processes: Dietary Proscriptions as a Product of the Interaction of Psychological Mechanisms and Social Processes. Journal of Cognition and Culture, 3(1), 1-40.

Type

Journal article

Intellectual base

Primary research

Year

2003

DOI

10.1556/jcep.1.2003.1.1

Link

https://doi.org/10.1556/JCEP.1.2003.1.1

Cited from

economics_finance

Cited by

1 citation across 1 artifact.

Each citation links to the sentence it supports in the citing article.

Primes

• Overton Window
  • In dietary norms, it is the foods a culture treats as edible or appropriate, with raw fish, insects, and organ meats moving in or out over decades.

    This sourceDietary acceptability as a culturally variable, shifting band — which foods (organ meats, insects, raw fish) count as edible/appropriate is socially constructed and moves over time.

Verification

This reference passed the adversarial substantiation pipeline: it was checked to exist and to support the claim it is attached to. See how references were verified.

Registry ID ref:4f16aa57f815 · see in the full table