Cockpit Checklists¶
Degani, A., & Wiener, E. L. (2010). Cockpit Checklists: Concepts, Design, and Use. Human Factors, 35(2), 345-359.
Cited by¶
5 citations across 5 artifacts.
Each citation links to the sentence it supports in the citing article.
Mechanisms¶
- All-Conditions Checklist
- The instrument traces to the modern safety checklist
This sourceExplains cockpit checklists as safety devices designed so crews need not rely on memory for required checks.
- The instrument traces to the modern safety checklist
- Cognitive Offloading Aid
- An airline cockpit runs on the pre-flight checklist — the paradigm cognitive offloading aid, born after a 1935 test flight of a new Boeing bomber crashed because a highly experienced crew forgot a single step.
This sourceDescribes cockpit checklists as external aids for reliably completing critical procedural steps and traces modern aviation checklist practice to the 1935 Boeing Model 299 crash after an experienced crew omitted a required control action.
- An airline cockpit runs on the pre-flight checklist — the paradigm cognitive offloading aid, born after a 1935 test flight of a new Boeing bomber crashed because a highly experienced crew forgot a single step.
- Field Kit Packout
- A pre-departure verification against a checklist is the same discipline a pilot's preflight enforces: the list exists precisely because confident recall is what fails.
This sourceTreats preflight checklists as verification aids that standardize critical tasks and compensate for limits of unaided human performance.
- A pre-departure verification against a checklist is the same discipline a pilot's preflight enforces: the list exists precisely because confident recall is what fails.
- Preflight Consequence Checklist
- The checklist forecasts nothing; it simply refuses to let the team cross the commitment boundary until each known consequence has been spoken and confirmed against what a safe operation requires.
This sourceCockpit checklists support safe operation by ensuring required actions are completed without omission.
- The checklist forecasts nothing; it simply refuses to let the team cross the commitment boundary until each known consequence has been spoken and confirmed against what a safe operation requires.
- Reentry Readiness Checklist
- The read-do versus do-confirm distinction, drawn from aviation practice, is what keeps a checklist useful to experts rather than an insult to them.
This sourceThe cited work establishes The read-do versus do-confirm distinction and drawn from aviation practice.
- The read-do versus do-confirm distinction, drawn from aviation practice, is what keeps a checklist useful to experts rather than an insult to them.
Verification¶
Does it exist? Confirmed. This work's DOI resolves to a registered record, which fixes its identity. That is all it fixes.
Does it back the claim? Not recorded. Neither this nor any other of the 5 citations of this work carries a recorded support check.
Was it audited? Yes. A second, independent pass read the citation against the article text and recorded a verdict.
Support is checked per citation rather than per work — the same source can be cited soundly in one article and wrongly in another. Per-citation recording began recently, so a citation with no recorded check is a gap in the record rather than evidence it went unchecked.
See how references were verified.
Links previously used in the corpus¶
Before the registry existed this work was also linked 1 other way.
Registry ID ref:4f43208f7fcd · see in the full table