Using effect size — or why the P value is not enough.

Sullivan, G. M., & Feinn, R. (2012). Using effect size — or why the P value is not enough. Journal of Graduate Medical Education, 4(3), 279-282.

Type

Journal article

Intellectual base

Primary research

Year

2012

Volume

4

Issue

3

Pages

279-282

DOI

10.4300/jgme-d-12-00156.1

DOI registrant

Journal of Graduate Medical Education

Link

https://doi.org/10.4300/JGME-D-12-00156.1

Cited from

statistics_experimental_design

Cited by

1 citation across 1 artifact.

Primes

• Effect Size
  • The medical tradition emphasizes communicating effect size in absolute terms (NNT for harm prevention, cost per life-year saved) alongside relative metrics, serving decision-making by patients, clinicians, and regulators

Verification

Does it exist? Confirmed. This work's DOI resolves to a registered record, which fixes its identity. That is all it fixes.

Does it back the claim? Not recorded. The single citation of this work carries no recorded support check.

Support is checked per citation rather than per work — the same source can be cited soundly in one article and wrongly in another. Per-citation recording began recently, so a citation with no recorded check is a gap in the record rather than evidence it went unchecked.

See how references were verified.

Registry ID ref:4ff7294e29aa · see in the full table