Manitoba (Attorney General) v. Metropolitan Stores Ltd.¶
Supreme Court of Canada. (1987). Manitoba (Attorney General) v. Metropolitan Stores Ltd.
Cited by¶
1 citation across 1 artifact.
Each citation links to the sentence it supports in the citing article.
Domain-specific¶
- Presumption of Constitutionality
- In U.S. constitutional review, a strong validity presumption and the burden of negating conceivable rational bases appear in a particular nonsuspect economic-classification/rational-basis setting; U.S. decisions themselves identify potentially narrower operation for specific constitutional prohibitions.
This source110, reasons paras. 12–26, official court text. The court distinguishes the rejected literal Charter-validity presumption, ordinary proof and construction.
- In U.S. constitutional review, a strong validity presumption and the burden of negating conceivable rational bases appear in a particular nonsuspect economic-classification/rational-basis setting; U.S. decisions themselves identify potentially narrower operation for specific constitutional prohibitions.
Verification¶
Does it exist? Not checked yet. This entry carries no identifier to resolve. It was extracted from the citation as written in the article, normalized, and deduplicated against the rest of the registry.
Does it back the claim? Not recorded. The single citation of this work carries no recorded support check.
Support is checked per citation rather than per work — the same source can be cited soundly in one article and wrongly in another. Per-citation recording began recently, so a citation with no recorded check is a gap in the record rather than evidence it went unchecked.
See how references were verified.
Registry ID ref:50012c846da1 · see in the full table