Institutional Function versus Form¶
Ho, P. (2018). Institutional Function versus Form: The Evolutionary Credibility of Land, Housing and Natural Resources. Land Use Policy.
Cited by¶
1 citation across 1 artifact.
Domain-specific¶
- Credibility thesis
- The credibility thesis is a heterodox institutional-economics account in which institutions emerge and change endogenously, while their persistence depends on the socially supported functions they perform rather than on conformity to an intended formal design.
Supported in partVerified against the work's full text
Ho (2018) backs endogenous institutional emergence and function-based persistence, but not the article's 'heterodox institutional-economics' label.
“This premise – known as the “Credibility Thesis” – entails that enduring institutions have been formed through endogenous evolution. As such, they are l ikely functionally adapted and, in effect, credible; otherwise, they w ould have changed, atrophied, or become extinct.”
- The credibility thesis is a heterodox institutional-economics account in which institutions emerge and change endogenously, while their persistence depends on the socially supported functions they perform rather than on conformity to an intended formal design.
Verification¶
Does it exist? Confirmed. This work's DOI resolves to a registered record, which fixes its identity. That is all it fixes.
Does it back the claim? Read against the text for 1 of 1 citation: 1 supported in part. Each verdict is shown under its citation below, with what in the work backs the sentence.
Support is checked per citation rather than per work — the same source can be cited soundly in one article and wrongly in another. Per-citation recording began recently, so a citation with no recorded check is a gap in the record rather than evidence it went unchecked.
See how references were verified.
Registry ID ref:501026a55df5 · see in the full table