A parts-per-billion measurement of the antiproton magnetic moment¶
Smorra, C., Sellner, S., Borchert, M. J., Harrington, J. A., Higuchi, T., Nagahama, H., Tanaka, T., et al. (2017). A parts-per-billion measurement of the antiproton magnetic moment. Nature, 550(7676), 371-374.
Cited by¶
1 citation across 1 artifact.
Primes¶
- Comparison
- The output relation is "the magnetic moments are equal to within experimental precision," and Smorra et al.'s (2017) BASE-collaboration measurement of the antiproton magnetic moment as −2.7928473441(42) nuclear magnetons — agreeing with the proton at the parts-per-billion level — is the current canonical instance.
SupportedVerified against the work's full text
Smorra et al. report the antiproton moment as -2.7928473441(42) nuclear magnetons at 1.5 ppb precision, consistent with the proton moment and with CPT invariance.
“Our result = −2.7928473441(42) μ N”
- The output relation is "the magnetic moments are equal to within experimental precision," and Smorra et al.'s (2017) BASE-collaboration measurement of the antiproton magnetic moment as −2.7928473441(42) nuclear magnetons — agreeing with the proton at the parts-per-billion level — is the current canonical instance.
Verification¶
Does it exist? Confirmed. This work's DOI resolves to a registered record, which fixes its identity. That is all it fixes.
Does it back the claim? Read against the text for 1 of 1 citation: 1 supported. Each verdict is shown under its citation below, with what in the work backs the sentence.
Support is checked per citation rather than per work — the same source can be cited soundly in one article and wrongly in another. Per-citation recording began recently, so a citation with no recorded check is a gap in the record rather than evidence it went unchecked.
See how references were verified.
Registry ID ref:5076c8d3c5c4 · see in the full table