Scales, Norms, and Equivalent Scores¶
Angoff, W. H. (1971). Scales, Norms, and Equivalent Scores. Educational Measurement.
Cited by¶
1 citation across 1 artifact.
Each citation links to the sentence it supports in the citing article.
Mechanisms¶
- Standardized Credentialing Exam
- The passing score is not picked by an instructor's intuition; it is set through a formal standard-setting study in which panels of practicing lawyers judge, item by item, what a minimally competent entrant should be able to do — an Angoff-style process that yields a defensible cut score.
This sourcePresents a formal Angoff standard-setting procedure that aggregates judges’ item-level estimates for a minimally acceptable examinee into a cut score.
- The passing score is not picked by an instructor's intuition; it is set through a formal standard-setting study in which panels of practicing lawyers judge, item by item, what a minimally competent entrant should be able to do — an Angoff-style process that yields a defensible cut score.
Verification¶
Does it exist? Not checked yet. This entry carries no identifier to resolve. It was extracted from the citation as written in the article, normalized, and deduplicated against the rest of the registry.
Does it back the claim? Not recorded. The single citation of this work carries no recorded support check.
Support is checked per citation rather than per work — the same source can be cited soundly in one article and wrongly in another. Per-citation recording began recently, so a citation with no recorded check is a gap in the record rather than evidence it went unchecked.
See how references were verified.
Registry ID ref:53a0729a79eb · see in the full table