Geschichten der romanischen und germanischen Völker von 1494 bis 1514¶
Ranke, L. v. (1824). Geschichten der romanischen und germanischen Völker von 1494 bis 1514.
Cited by¶
3 citations across 3 artifacts.
Each citation links to the sentence it supports in the citing article.
Primes¶
- Anachronism
- … or deliberate (creative-anachronism comedy, intentional style-collage); and (4) the effect on understanding depends on whether the anachronism is flagged or concealed—unmarked anachronisms produce distorted understanding of the depicted period; marked anachronisms produce recognized artistic or analytical effects.
This sourceEstablishes the commitment to understanding 'how it actually was' (wie es eigentlich gewesen) through detailed source criticism, accepting each age in its own character — cited inline as the regulative ideal that marking/concealing anachronism presumes. [Title-year fix: the 1824 first edition covers '1494 bis 1514'; the '...bis 1535' span belongs to the later collected-works edition.]
- … or deliberate (creative-anachronism comedy, intentional style-collage); and (4) the effect on understanding depends on whether the anachronism is flagged or concealed—unmarked anachronisms produce distorted understanding of the depicted period; marked anachronisms produce recognized artistic or analytical effects.
- Historicism
- Ranke (1824) in Geschichten der romanischen und germanischen Völker launched the historicist program by insisting that each nation's history had to be understood from within its own developmental logic rather than measured against contemporary standards or abstract ideals.
This sourceEstablished the historiographical commitment to understanding "how it actually was" (wie es eigentlich gewesen), which revisionism presumes as a regulative ideal.
Supported in partVerified against the work's full text
Ranke's 1824 preface rejects history's office of judging the past and aims to show each people and power as it was, but never states a historicist programme.
“jeber Mad^t, jebem Einzelnen, toie fie getoefen”
- Ranke (1824) in Geschichten der romanischen und germanischen Völker launched the historicist program by insisting that each nation's history had to be understood from within its own developmental logic rather than measured against contemporary standards or abstract ideals.
- Revisionism
- Cold War historiography and the revisionist debate. The Cold War itself became the subject of revisionist contestation: traditionalist historiography emphasized Soviet aggression and the West's defensive necessity; revisionist historians (influenced by the Vietnam War and the consciousness of American imperialism) reinterpreted the same Cold War events as driven by American containment strategy and the extension of American power, in deliberate counterpoint to Ranke's (1824) regulative ideal of recovering "how it actually was."
This sourceEstablished the historiographical commitment to understanding "how it actually was" (wie es eigentlich gewesen), which revisionism presumes as a regulative ideal.
Supported in partVerified against the work's full text
Ranke's 1824 preface is the right work for the 'how it actually was' ideal, but it says nothing on the Cold War, and the OCR garbles the key phrase.
“Man l^at ber ^iftorie ba§ 5lmt, bie S5ergangen^eit 3U richten”
- Cold War historiography and the revisionist debate. The Cold War itself became the subject of revisionist contestation: traditionalist historiography emphasized Soviet aggression and the West's defensive necessity; revisionist historians (influenced by the Vietnam War and the consciousness of American imperialism) reinterpreted the same Cold War events as driven by American containment strategy and the extension of American power, in deliberate counterpoint to Ranke's (1824) regulative ideal of recovering "how it actually was."
Verification¶
Does it exist? Not checked yet. This entry carries no identifier to resolve. It was extracted from the citation as written in the article, normalized, and deduplicated against the rest of the registry.
Does it back the claim? Read against the text for 2 of 3 citations: 2 supported in part. Each verdict is shown under its citation below, with what in the work backs the sentence.
Support is checked per citation rather than per work — the same source can be cited soundly in one article and wrongly in another. Per-citation recording began recently, so a citation with no recorded check is a gap in the record rather than evidence it went unchecked.
See how references were verified.
Registry ID ref:54585411d6f1 · see in the full table