Seila Law LLC v. Consumer Financial Protection Bureau¶
Supreme Court of the United States. (2020). Seila Law LLC v. Consumer Financial Protection Bureau. United States Reports.
Cited by¶
1 citation across 1 artifact.
Each citation links to the sentence it supports in the citing article.
Mechanisms¶
- Legal or Policy Sections
- Its strength is that scoping each section lets a rule be interpreted, amended, and enforced locally, and lets a defective part be excised without felling the whole — the payoff a well-drafted severability clause is designed to secure.
This sourceExplains that a severability clause is designed to preserve the remainder of a law when one provision is invalidated.
- Its strength is that scoping each section lets a rule be interpreted, amended, and enforced locally, and lets a defective part be excised without felling the whole — the payoff a well-drafted severability clause is designed to secure.
Verification¶
Does it exist? Not checked yet. This entry carries no identifier to resolve. It was extracted from the citation as written in the article, normalized, and deduplicated against the rest of the registry.
Does it back the claim? Not recorded. The single citation of this work carries no recorded support check.
Support is checked per citation rather than per work — the same source can be cited soundly in one article and wrongly in another. Per-citation recording began recently, so a citation with no recorded check is a gap in the record rather than evidence it went unchecked.
See how references were verified.
Registry ID ref:5492d2f40345 · see in the full table