An Experimental Study of Co-evolution Between the Cuckoo, Cuculus canorus, and its Hosts. I. Host Egg Discrimination¶
Davies, N. B., & Brooke, M. D. L. (1989). An Experimental Study of Co-evolution Between the Cuckoo, Cuculus canorus, and its Hosts. I. Host Egg Discrimination. Journal of Animal Ecology, 58(1), 207-224.
Cited by¶
1 citation across 1 artifact.
Each citation links to the sentence it supports in the citing article.
Primes¶
- Data-Control Plane Breach
- Social engineering and pretexting: an attacker-supplied story crosses into the victim's instruction-following channel via trust-based authentication shortcuts. Bureaucratic and legal interpretation: a descriptive memo is read as a directive because of channel authority; boilerplate is read as substantive obligation because recitals are not distinguished from operative provisions. Animal brood parasitism and pheromone mimicry: a parasite's signals cross into the host's behavioural-control channel because the host's recognition apparatus reads the data as a directive.
This sourceClassic study of brood parasitism: a parasite's signals exploit the host's recognition apparatus, which reads the parasite's egg/young as legitimate (data read as a directive).
- Social engineering and pretexting: an attacker-supplied story crosses into the victim's instruction-following channel via trust-based authentication shortcuts. Bureaucratic and legal interpretation: a descriptive memo is read as a directive because of channel authority; boilerplate is read as substantive obligation because recitals are not distinguished from operative provisions. Animal brood parasitism and pheromone mimicry: a parasite's signals cross into the host's behavioural-control channel because the host's recognition apparatus reads the data as a directive.
Verification¶
Does it exist? Confirmed. This work's DOI resolves to a registered record, which fixes its identity. That is all it fixes.
Does it back the claim? Not recorded. The single citation of this work carries no recorded support check.
Support is checked per citation rather than per work — the same source can be cited soundly in one article and wrongly in another. Per-citation recording began recently, so a citation with no recorded check is a gap in the record rather than evidence it went unchecked.
See how references were verified.
Registry ID ref:5509877f5a9f · see in the full table