Inference to the Best Explanation¶
Lipton, P. (2004). Inference to the Best Explanation. Routledge.
Cited by¶
2 citations across 2 artifacts.
Each citation links to the sentence it supports in the citing article.
Primes¶
- Abductive Reasoning
- It is also defeasible: a later observation, or the surfacing of a better candidate hypothesis, can overturn what was previously the best explanation, and so the conclusion is always held under a "best so far" rather than a "settled" status, a feature Lipton's 2004 monograph on inference to the best explanation treats as constitutive rather than incidental.
This sourceDevelops inference to the best explanation as a distinctive ampliative inference whose conclusions are held defeasibly under a 'best so far' status; uses the Le Verrier–Adams–Neptune episode as a canonical exemplar of successful scientific abduction.
- It is also defeasible: a later observation, or the surfacing of a better candidate hypothesis, can overturn what was previously the best explanation, and so the conclusion is always held under a "best so far" rather than a "settled" status, a feature Lipton's 2004 monograph on inference to the best explanation treats as constitutive rather than incidental.
- Inductive Reasoning
- Lipton's account
This sourceDevelops inference to the best explanation as a distinctive ampliative inference whose conclusions are held defeasibly under a "best so far" status; uses the Le Verrier–Neptune episode as a canonical scientific exemplar.
- Lipton's account
Verification¶
This reference passed the adversarial substantiation pipeline: it was checked to exist and to support the claim it is attached to. See how references were verified.
Registry ID ref:550e3a0f8fe6 · see in the full table