Emotion regulation¶
Gross, J. J. (2002). Emotion regulation: Affective, cognitive, and social consequences. Psychophysiology, 39(3), 281-291.
Cited by¶
3 citations across 3 artifacts.
Each citation links to the sentence it supports in the citing article.
Primes¶
- Cognitive Appraisal
- Cognitive appraisal operates across clinical psychology (the theoretical foundation of cognitive-behavioral therapy's reappraisal techniques for anxiety, depression, trauma, and PTSD; stress-inoculation training and emotion-regulation interventions),
This sourceProcess model of emotion regulation classifying reappraisal as an antecedent-focused strategy that decreases emotion experience and expression.
Supported in partVerified against the publisher's abstract
Gross (2002) supplies only the process-model account of reappraisal as an antecedent-focused emotion-regulation strategy that lowers emotional impact; it never mentions CBT, clinical psychology, or the named disorders.
“The first, reappraisal, comes early in the emotion‐generative process. It consists of changing the way a situation is construed so as to decrease its emotional impact.”
- Cognitive appraisal operates across clinical psychology (the theoretical foundation of cognitive-behavioral therapy's reappraisal techniques for anxiety, depression, trauma, and PTSD; stress-inoculation training and emotion-regulation interventions),
- Emotional Reasoning
- Pure emotional suppression may reduce anxiety short-term while eroding emotional intelligence long-term.
This sourceProcess model of emotion regulation; reframing classified as "reappraisal," a core regulatory strategy. Gross process-model situates reframing-as-reappraisal in emotion-regulation taxonomy.
- Pure emotional suppression may reduce anxiety short-term while eroding emotional intelligence long-term.
Domain-specific¶
- Cognitive Reframing
- When a recommender system exhibits maladaptive behavior (engagement-maximization amplifying user harm), the intervention that preserves training data while changing the loss function—swapping engagement for a composite objective including user welfare—is structurally identical to cognitive reframing.
This sourceProcess model of emotion regulation; classifies reappraisal as an antecedent-focused strategy that changes how a situation is construed to decrease emotional impact — the precise mechanism the prime calls reframing. Verified with DOI.
Supported in partVerified against the publisher's abstract
Gives the reappraisal definition the claim's 'cognitive reframing' term rests on, but not the asserted identity with swapping a recommender's loss function.
“The first, reappraisal, comes early in the emotion-generative process. It consists of changing the way a situation is construed so as to decrease its emotional impact.”
- When a recommender system exhibits maladaptive behavior (engagement-maximization amplifying user harm), the intervention that preserves training data while changing the loss function—swapping engagement for a composite objective including user welfare—is structurally identical to cognitive reframing.
Verification¶
Does it exist? Confirmed. This work's DOI resolves to a registered record, which fixes its identity. That is all it fixes.
Does it back the claim? Read against the text for 2 of 3 citations: 2 supported in part. Each verdict is shown under its citation below, with what in the work backs the sentence.
Support is checked per citation rather than per work — the same source can be cited soundly in one article and wrongly in another. Per-citation recording began recently, so a citation with no recorded check is a gap in the record rather than evidence it went unchecked.
See how references were verified.
Registry ID ref:5526f18d7d07 · see in the full table