Hawthorne effects and research into professional practice

Holden, J. D. (2001). Hawthorne effects and research into professional practice. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice, 7(1), 65-70.

Type

Journal article

Intellectual base

Primary research

Year

2001

Volume

7

Issue

1

Pages

65-70

Link

https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2753.2001.00280.xmatched

Cited from

physics

Cited by

1 citation across 1 artifact.

Each citation links to the sentence it supports in the citing article.

Primes

• Measurement and Disturbance
  • Tools like invasiveness-spectrum analysis (how much does each measurement method disturb?), control-experiment design (measure both the system with and without the measurement apparatus), and calibration procedures (quantify disturbance independently) transfer across domains, as Holden (2001) documents in tracing the Hawthorne effect and analogous measurement-coupling biases through clinical and behavioral research literatures.

    This sourceReviews Hawthorne and analogous measurement-coupling biases in clinical and behavioral research; documents how invasiveness-spectrum analysis, control-experiment design, and calibration procedures transfer the disturbance-management toolkit across domains.

Verification

Does it exist? Not checked yet. This entry carries no identifier to resolve. It was extracted from the citation as written in the article, normalized, and deduplicated against the rest of the registry.

Does it back the claim? Not recorded. The single citation of this work carries no recorded support check.

Support is checked per citation rather than per work — the same source can be cited soundly in one article and wrongly in another. Per-citation recording began recently, so a citation with no recorded check is a gap in the record rather than evidence it went unchecked.

See how references were verified.

Registry ID ref:55b9fc6a4092 · see in the full table