Principles of Historical Linguistics¶
Hock, H. H. (1991). Principles of Historical Linguistics.
Cited by¶
1 citation across 1 artifact.
Each citation links to the sentence it supports in the citing article.
Domain-specific¶
- Morphology
- Language typology — the home descriptive use: the morphological-type axis (isolating–agglutinative–fusional–polysynthetic) is the analytic tool that makes the world's languages' word-internal variation measurable, reading word length, category obligatoriness, and grammatical load off one coordinate. Historical linguistics — reconstructs how affixes grammaticalise and decay over time and tracks analogical levelling, in which a productive rule erodes a stored irregular
This sourceHock's treatment of analogical levelling as a systematic process of historical change.
Supported in partVerified against the work's full text
“Hans Henrich Hock Principles of [Historical Linguistics] Second revised and updated edition Mouton”
- Language typology — the home descriptive use: the morphological-type axis (isolating–agglutinative–fusional–polysynthetic) is the analytic tool that makes the world's languages' word-internal variation measurable, reading word length, category obligatoriness, and grammatical load off one coordinate. Historical linguistics — reconstructs how affixes grammaticalise and decay over time and tracks analogical levelling, in which a productive rule erodes a stored irregular
Verification¶
Does it exist? Not checked yet. This entry carries no identifier to resolve. It was extracted from the citation as written in the article, normalized, and deduplicated against the rest of the registry.
Does it back the claim? Read against the text for 1 of 1 citation: 1 supported in part. Each verdict is shown under its citation below, with what in the work backs the sentence.
Support is checked per citation rather than per work — the same source can be cited soundly in one article and wrongly in another. Per-citation recording began recently, so a citation with no recorded check is a gap in the record rather than evidence it went unchecked.
See how references were verified.
Registry ID ref:55ebf687d50d · see in the full table