Eyewitness Testimony¶
Loftus, E. F. (1979). Eyewitness Testimony. Harvard University Press.
Cited by¶
5 citations across 5 artifacts.
Each citation links to the sentence it supports in the citing article.
Primes¶
- Evidence-Fidelity Decay
- In law, witness statements taken days after an event blend what the witness saw, what interviewers cued the witness toward, and what the witness reconstructed for coherence — and cross-examination functions partly as a recovery tool for the attribution that statement-taking destroyed.
This sourceDemonstrates that delayed witness recollection is reconstructive and contaminated by post-event suggestion, schema, and interviewer cueing — directional, not zero-mean, distortion.
- In law, witness statements taken days after an event blend what the witness saw, what interviewers cued the witness toward, and what the witness reconstructed for coherence — and cross-examination functions partly as a recovery tool for the attribution that statement-taking destroyed.
- Pattern Completion (Filling the Incomplete)
- Explicit uncertainty tracking is available in many implementations (Bayesian models with posterior variance, dropout in neural networks for confidence intervals, Bayesian ensembles, temperature-based uncertainty in LLMs) but is often not surfaced to downstream consumers or decision-makers, who treat the completion as fact rather than hypothesis.
This sourceLandmark empirical documentation of false memory and confabulation in eyewitness reports; shows that memory completion blurs veridical detail with schematically-consistent inference, producing coherent but inaccurate narratives.
- Explicit uncertainty tracking is available in many implementations (Bayesian models with posterior variance, dropout in neural networks for confidence intervals, Bayesian ensembles, temperature-based uncertainty in LLMs) but is often not surfaced to downstream consumers or decision-makers, who treat the completion as fact rather than hypothesis.
- Rashomon Effect
- In law and journalism, multiple eyewitnesses to one incident produce internally consistent but conflicting accounts that fit the same physical evidence equally well, and cross-examination, forensic reconstruction, and third-party records are needed to break the symmetry.
This sourceEstablishes that multiple honest eyewitnesses to one event produce systematically divergent, vantage- and reconstruction-bound accounts, requiring external evidence to adjudicate.
- In law and journalism, multiple eyewitnesses to one incident produce internally consistent but conflicting accounts that fit the same physical evidence equally well, and cross-examination, forensic reconstruction, and third-party records are needed to break the symmetry.
- Reality Monitoring
- Journalism and evidence handling — tagging each claim with its source (primary witness, secondary report, AI summary, inference) so confidence can be calibrated appropriately. Legal and forensic — eyewitness versus suggested-memory discrimination, document provenance chains, and chain of custody, the institutional machinery for preventing source confusion under eroding conditions.
This sourceDocuments how suggestion contaminates source attribution in eyewitness memory, the basis for forensic safeguards against source confusion.
- Journalism and evidence handling — tagging each claim with its source (primary witness, secondary report, AI summary, inference) so confidence can be calibrated appropriately. Legal and forensic — eyewitness versus suggested-memory discrimination, document provenance chains, and chain of custody, the institutional machinery for preventing source confusion under eroding conditions.
- Unreliable Narrator
- Forensics and witness evaluation — testimony processed against a known model of witness fallibility: distance, lighting, motive, memory decay, leading questions, cross-race identification effects.
This sourceDocuments the systematic distortions of perception and memory — leading-question contamination, weapon focus, confidence inflation — that make a witness a characterisable, invertible source.
- Forensics and witness evaluation — testimony processed against a known model of witness fallibility: distance, lighting, motive, memory decay, leading questions, cross-race identification effects.
Verification¶
Does it exist? Not checked yet. This entry carries no identifier to resolve. It was extracted from the citation as written in the article, normalized, and deduplicated against the rest of the registry.
Does it back the claim? Not recorded. Neither this nor any other of the 5 citations of this work carries a recorded support check.
Support is checked per citation rather than per work — the same source can be cited soundly in one article and wrongly in another. Per-citation recording began recently, so a citation with no recorded check is a gap in the record rather than evidence it went unchecked.
See how references were verified.
Registry ID ref:564ec0fe6e65 · see in the full table