Biological robustness¶
Kitano, H. (2004). Biological robustness. Nature Reviews Genetics, 5(11), 826-837.
Cited by¶
1 citation across 1 artifact.
Each citation links to the sentence it supports in the citing article.
Primes¶
- Robustness
- … across input-space region rather than point; the graceful-degradation curve replacing cliff-failure boundaries; the stress-envelope specification as primary design quantity; the design-margin, redundancy, fault-tolerance combination; the robust-yet-fragile trade-off across different envelope classes
This sourceKitano robust-yet-fragile trade-off.
Supported in partVerified against the publisher's abstract
Kitano's abstract backs only the robust-yet-fragile trade-off; it says nothing about input-space regions, graceful degradation, stress envelopes, or design margin/redundancy/fault tolerance.
“Enhanced robustness against certain perturbations has to be balanced by extreme fragility elsewhere. This robust yet fragile nature, predicted by the highly optimized tolerance (HOT) theory, is a fundamental property of the system that has been optimally designed or has evolved to cope with perturbations.”
- … across input-space region rather than point; the graceful-degradation curve replacing cliff-failure boundaries; the stress-envelope specification as primary design quantity; the design-margin, redundancy, fault-tolerance combination; the robust-yet-fragile trade-off across different envelope classes
Verification¶
Does it exist? Not checked yet. This entry carries no identifier to resolve. It was extracted from the citation as written in the article, normalized, and deduplicated against the rest of the registry.
Does it back the claim? Read against the text for 1 of 1 citation: 1 supported in part. Each verdict is shown under its citation below, with what in the work backs the sentence.
Support is checked per citation rather than per work — the same source can be cited soundly in one article and wrongly in another. Per-citation recording began recently, so a citation with no recorded check is a gap in the record rather than evidence it went unchecked.
See how references were verified.
Registry ID ref:56d2baddfc34 · see in the full table