Opinion 05/2014 on Anonymisation Techniques¶
Party, A. 2. D. P. W. (2014). Opinion 05/2014 on Anonymisation Techniques.
Cited by¶
1 citation across 1 artifact.
Each citation links to the sentence it supports in the citing article.
Mechanisms¶
- Tokenization or Masking
- A vault-backed token is reversible — the raw value still exists, so you've concentrated risk in the vault, not removed it — and deterministic tokens still let holders link and correlate records even without ever decoding them.
This sourceExplains that keyed pseudonymization and tokenization remain reversible, retain personal-data risk, and can preserve linkability across records.
- A vault-backed token is reversible — the raw value still exists, so you've concentrated risk in the vault, not removed it — and deterministic tokens still let holders link and correlate records even without ever decoding them.
Verification¶
Does it exist? Not checked yet. This entry carries no identifier to resolve. It was extracted from the citation as written in the article, normalized, and deduplicated against the rest of the registry.
Does it back the claim? Not recorded. The single citation of this work carries no recorded support check.
Support is checked per citation rather than per work — the same source can be cited soundly in one article and wrongly in another. Per-citation recording began recently, so a citation with no recorded check is a gap in the record rather than evidence it went unchecked.
See how references were verified.
Registry ID ref:56ee8e2db3af · see in the full table