The Nature of Prejudice¶
Allport, G. W. (1954). The Nature of Prejudice. Addison-Wesley.
Cited by¶
6 citations across 5 artifacts.
Each citation links to the sentence it supports in the citing article.
Primes¶
- Ethnocentrism
- Allport's work on prejudice
This sourceClassic analysis establishing the contact hypothesis: prejudice is reduced by intergroup contact under equal status, common goals, cooperation, and institutional support, whereas displaced-hostility/scapegoating dynamics persist when only surface attitudes are targeted.
- Allport's work on prejudice
- In-Group / Out-Group
- Allport's (1954) analysis of prejudice made this separation foundational, distinguishing the cognitive act of categorization from the affective and behavioral asymmetries that accrue to it.
This sourceClassic analysis of how out-groups absorb displaced hostility during periods of frustration
- Allport's (1954) analysis of prejudice made this separation foundational, distinguishing the cognitive act of categorization from the affective and behavioral asymmetries that accrue to it.
- Scapegoating
- Stereotyping
- As Allport (1954) detailed in his foundational treatment of prejudice, the agent observes a category cue (race, gender, age, occupation, nationality), activates an associated prototype or expectation, and projects that expectation onto the individual without detailed assessment.
This sourceClassic analysis of how out-groups absorb displaced hostility during periods of frustration
- As Allport (1954) argued in The Nature of Prejudice, clarity here redirects attention from moral judgment ("Are stereotypes bad?") to structural mechanism ("How are categories being applied to individuals, and what information is being lost in that compression?").
This sourceReframes the analysis of stereotypes from moral judgment ("are they bad?") to structural mechanism ("how is category information being applied to individuals?")—surfacing the cognitive operation that makes prejudice possible.
- As Allport (1954) detailed in his foundational treatment of prejudice, the agent observes a category cue (race, gender, age, occupation, nationality), activates an associated prototype or expectation, and projects that expectation onto the individual without detailed assessment.
Mechanisms¶
- Voluntary Contact Session
- It is the operational core of Allport's contact hypothesis, which held that contact reduces prejudice not automatically but under enabling conditions — equal status, cooperation toward common goals, and supportive sponsorship.
This sourceFrames prejudice-reducing contact as conditional on equal status, common goals, cooperation, and authority support.
- It is the operational core of Allport's contact hypothesis, which held that contact reduces prejudice not automatically but under enabling conditions — equal status, cooperation toward common goals, and supportive sponsorship.
Verification¶
This reference passed the adversarial substantiation pipeline: it was checked to exist and to support the claim it is attached to. See how references were verified.
Links previously used in the corpus¶
Before the registry existed this work was also linked 1 other way.
Registry ID ref:5743165b74f8 · see in the full table