Williams v. United States¶
U.S. Supreme Court. (1933). Williams v. United States.
Cited by¶
1 citation across 1 artifact.
Each citation links to the sentence it supports in the citing article.
Domain-specific¶
- Obiter Dictum
- Williams v. United States distinguished incidental remarks from a later, carefully reasoned discussion that was also not strictly necessary to its earlier decision.
This sourcePrimary judicial opinion for classification of prior Court of Claims status remarks as obiter, citation of Cohens, and differentiated assessment of the reasoned but nonnecessary Ex parte Bakelite discussion.
- Williams v. United States distinguished incidental remarks from a later, carefully reasoned discussion that was also not strictly necessary to its earlier decision.
Verification¶
Does it exist? Not checked yet. This entry carries no identifier to resolve. It was extracted from the citation as written in the article, normalized, and deduplicated against the rest of the registry.
Does it back the claim? Not recorded. The single citation of this work carries no recorded support check.
Support is checked per citation rather than per work — the same source can be cited soundly in one article and wrongly in another. Per-citation recording began recently, so a citation with no recorded check is a gap in the record rather than evidence it went unchecked.
See how references were verified.
Registry ID ref:57dc4ff62938 · see in the full table