Black holes: complementarity or firewalls?¶
Almheiri. (2013). Black holes: complementarity or firewalls?: complementarity or firewalls?.
Cited by¶
1 citation across 1 artifact.
Each citation links to the sentence it supports in the citing article.
Domain-specific¶
- Firewall Paradox
- The defining instance is the 2012 argument of Almheiri, Marolf, Polchinski, and Sully (AMPS) itself
This sourceThe AMPS paper by Almheiri, Marolf, Polchinski and Sully, whose abstract argues that three statements about black-hole radiation, effective field theory near the horizon, and an uneventful horizon crossing cannot all be true.
SupportedVerified against the work's full text
“We argue that the following three statements cannot all be true”
- The defining instance is the 2012 argument of Almheiri, Marolf, Polchinski, and Sully (AMPS) itself
Verification¶
Does it exist? Not checked yet. This work's DOI is recorded above but has not been resolved against an external catalogue, so nothing here confirms the work exists.
Does it back the claim? Read against the text for 1 of 1 citation: 1 supported. Each verdict is shown under its citation below, with what in the work backs the sentence.
Support is checked per citation rather than per work — the same source can be cited soundly in one article and wrongly in another. Per-citation recording began recently, so a citation with no recorded check is a gap in the record rather than evidence it went unchecked.
See how references were verified.
Registry ID ref:58350c5af305 · see in the full table