Seven myths of randomisation in clinical trials.

Senn, S. (2013). Seven myths of randomisation in clinical trials. Statistics in Medicine, 32(9), 1439-1450.

Type

Journal article

Intellectual base

Primary research

Year

2013

Volume

32

Issue

9

Pages

1439-1450

DOI registrant

Wiley

Link

https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.5713 not authoritativefound

Cited from

statistics_experimental_design

Cited by

1 citation across 1 artifact.

Each citation links to the sentence it supports in the citing article.

Primes

• Randomization
  • 5. The chance-mechanism replacing systematic assignment — by introducing explicit stochasticity into allocation, randomization eliminates systematic assignment patterns (alternation, alphabetical, "switch on Mondays") that can leak information to enrollers and allow selection bias to corrupt the assignment mechanism

    This sourceSenn randomization myths sequential allocation concealment confounding.

Verification

Does it exist? Not checked yet. This entry carries no identifier to resolve. It was extracted from the citation as written in the article, normalized, and deduplicated against the rest of the registry.

Does it back the claim? Not recorded. The single citation of this work carries no recorded support check.

Support is checked per citation rather than per work — the same source can be cited soundly in one article and wrongly in another. Per-citation recording began recently, so a citation with no recorded check is a gap in the record rather than evidence it went unchecked.

See how references were verified.

Registry ID ref:58805c2a9970 · see in the full table