From Metaphor to Measurement: Resilience of What to What?¶
Carpenter, S., Walker, Anderies, & Abel, N. (2001). From Metaphor to Measurement: Resilience of What to What?: Resilience of what to what. Ecosystems, 4(8), 765-781.
Cited by¶
1 citation across 1 artifact.
Each citation links to the sentence it supports in the citing article.
Primes¶
- Resilience
- Every resilience claim specifies (1) the system whose resilience is being asserted, (2) the class of disturbances the system is expected to absorb, (3) the standard of "continued functioning" (identity, essential function, performance threshold), and (4) the mechanism by which the system resists, recovers, or adapts, as Carpenter, Walker, Anderies, and Abel (2001) argue in moving resilience from metaphor to measurement
This sourceArgues that every resilience claim must specify the system, the disturbance class, the standard of continued function, and the mechanism — the "of what, to what" formulation that turns resilience from a metaphor into a measurable property.
- Every resilience claim specifies (1) the system whose resilience is being asserted, (2) the class of disturbances the system is expected to absorb, (3) the standard of "continued functioning" (identity, essential function, performance threshold), and (4) the mechanism by which the system resists, recovers, or adapts, as Carpenter, Walker, Anderies, and Abel (2001) argue in moving resilience from metaphor to measurement
Verification¶
This reference passed the adversarial substantiation pipeline: it was checked to exist and to support the claim it is attached to. See how references were verified.
Registry ID ref:594901748638 · see in the full table