Proportional Representation¶
Pukelsheim, F. (2014). Proportional Representation: Apportionment Methods and Their Applications. Springer.
Cited by¶
1 citation across 1 artifact.
Each citation links to the sentence it supports in the citing article.
Domain-specific¶
- Alabama Paradox
- Legislative seat apportionment — the founding habitat: distributing a fixed number of legislative seats across constituencies by integer-floor-plus-largest-remainders, where enlarging the chamber can strip a state of a seat (the 1880 US House computation, Maine in later cycles). Largest-remainder proportional-representation electoral systems — PR rules that award parliamentary seats to party lists by the Hare quota and largest remainders run the identical algorithm
This sourceDocuments the Hare-quota method with residual fit by greatest remainders as the largest-remainders apportionment rule used for party-list seats.
SupportedVerified against the work's full text
“71 5.2. [Hare]-Quota Method with Residual Fit by Greatest [Remainders], 72 5.3. Greatest”
- Legislative seat apportionment — the founding habitat: distributing a fixed number of legislative seats across constituencies by integer-floor-plus-largest-remainders, where enlarging the chamber can strip a state of a seat (the 1880 US House computation, Maine in later cycles). Largest-remainder proportional-representation electoral systems — PR rules that award parliamentary seats to party lists by the Hare quota and largest remainders run the identical algorithm
Verification¶
Does it exist? Not checked yet. This entry carries no identifier to resolve. It was extracted from the citation as written in the article, normalized, and deduplicated against the rest of the registry.
Does it back the claim? Read against the text for 1 of 1 citation: 1 supported. Each verdict is shown under its citation below, with what in the work backs the sentence.
Support is checked per citation rather than per work — the same source can be cited soundly in one article and wrongly in another. Per-citation recording began recently, so a citation with no recorded check is a gap in the record rather than evidence it went unchecked.
See how references were verified.
Registry ID ref:59544233805d · see in the full table