Inspired¶
Cagan. (2017). Inspired: How to Create Tech Products Customers Love. John Wiley & Sons.
Cited by¶
1 citation across 1 artifact.
Each citation links to the sentence it supports in the citing article.
Domain-specific¶
- Operational Design
- The structural commitment — frame the problem and characterise the environment before prescribing the plan, producing a generative-revisable approach distinct from the prescriptive-executable plan — really does recur, and strikingly so: human-centred service design (the UK Service Standard, IDEO methodology), policy design (policy labs, behavioural-insights teams), organisational change (Lewin, Kotter, ADKAR's diagnostic-then-prescriptive sequencing), and software product management — where the discovery-versus-delivery split is structurally the very same design-then-plan workflow as the design–plan separation
This sourceCagan's Inspired supplies only the product-management leg of this list: discovery and delivery as distinct activities with distinct outputs, discovery determining whether and what to build before engineering commits - the service-design, policy-design and change-management legs, and the structural equivalence to military design, are the entry's own.
Supported in partVerified against the source
- The structural commitment — frame the problem and characterise the environment before prescribing the plan, producing a generative-revisable approach distinct from the prescriptive-executable plan — really does recur, and strikingly so: human-centred service design (the UK Service Standard, IDEO methodology), policy design (policy labs, behavioural-insights teams), organisational change (Lewin, Kotter, ADKAR's diagnostic-then-prescriptive sequencing), and software product management — where the discovery-versus-delivery split is structurally the very same design-then-plan workflow as the design–plan separation
Verification¶
Does it exist? Not checked yet. This entry carries no identifier to resolve. It was extracted from the citation as written in the article, normalized, and deduplicated against the rest of the registry.
Does it back the claim? Read against the text for 1 of 1 citation: 1 supported in part. Each verdict is shown under its citation below, with what in the work backs the sentence.
Support is checked per citation rather than per work — the same source can be cited soundly in one article and wrongly in another. Per-citation recording began recently, so a citation with no recorded check is a gap in the record rather than evidence it went unchecked.
See how references were verified.
Registry ID ref:5a4bf47bd42e · see in the full table