Desert Locust Q&A

Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. (2026). Desert Locust Q&A. FAO Locust Watch.

Type

Web resource

Intellectual base

Web

Year

2026

Link

https://www.fao.org/locusts/faqs/en/

Cited from

marine_science

Cited by

1 citation across 1 artifact.

Each citation links to the sentence it supports in the citing article.

Primes

• Bloom And Bust Cycle
  • Locust outbreaks: favourable rains allow a swarm that consumes vegetation and then collapses, with the post-collapse denuded landscape and secondary starvation exceeding the swarm's direct damage.

    This sourceStates the per-generation amplification of desert-locust populations: "Desert Locusts can multiply 20-fold with each new generation every three months. That means that in half a year, a group of locusts can grow 400 times in number and within a year there can be 160,000 times as many as at the outset," and that as numbers rise solitarious locusts gregarize into swarms that strip vegetation -- supporting the favourable-rain-driven ~20-fold-per-generation swarm growth and consumption.

    Supported in partVerified against the work's full text

    FAO Q&A supports weather-driven multi-generation swarm build-up and heavy vegetation consumption, but says nothing on swarm collapse, denuded landscape or secondary starvation.

    “When weather and habitat conditions are right for reproduction, multiple generations of locusts can be born and form swarms that invade countries that don’t usually have locust problems.”

    Read by an automated reader; not a human review. How support was checked

Verification

Does it exist? Not checked yet. This entry carries no identifier to resolve. It was extracted from the citation as written in the article, normalized, and deduplicated against the rest of the registry.

Does it back the claim? Read against the text for 1 of 1 citation: 1 supported in part. Each verdict is shown under its citation below, with what in the work backs the sentence.

Support is checked per citation rather than per work — the same source can be cited soundly in one article and wrongly in another. Per-citation recording began recently, so a citation with no recorded check is a gap in the record rather than evidence it went unchecked.

See how references were verified.

Registry ID ref:5a59a74905fd · see in the full table