The New Rhetoric¶
Perelman, C., & Olbrechts-Tyteca, L. (1969). The New Rhetoric: A Treatise on Argumentation. Notre Dame Press.
Cited by¶
2 citations across 2 artifacts.
Each citation links to the sentence it supports in the citing article.
Domain-specific¶
- Epideictic Rhetoric
- Modern rhetorical theory, especially Chaïm Perelman and Olbrechts-Tyteca's New Rhetoric, and Kenneth Burke's dramatism, substantially revalued the category
This sourcePerelman and Olbrechts-Tyteca's New Rhetoric, whose Epidictic Genre chapter treats epidictic oratory as a central concern alongside the deliberative and forensic genres.
Supported in partVerified against the source
- Modern rhetorical theory, especially Chaïm Perelman and Olbrechts-Tyteca's New Rhetoric, and Kenneth Burke's dramatism, substantially revalued the category
- Topoi
- Classical rhetorical invention — the home turf: Aristotle's Rhetoric and Topics catalogue of koinoi and idioi, Cicero's loci in De Inventione and Topica, Quintilian's Institutio Oratoria, and the whole ancient-through-Renaissance pedagogy of inventio as a taught search through stock argument-forms. Modern argumentation theory — the catalogue reappears as Perelman and Olbrechts-Tyteca's argumentation schemes in the New Rhetoric
This sourceThe New Rhetoric's catalogue of argumentative techniques (quasi-logical arguments, arguments based on and establishing the structure of reality, dissociation) together with loci of preference drawn from Aristotle's Topics.
SupportedVerified against the source
- Classical rhetorical invention — the home turf: Aristotle's Rhetoric and Topics catalogue of koinoi and idioi, Cicero's loci in De Inventione and Topica, Quintilian's Institutio Oratoria, and the whole ancient-through-Renaissance pedagogy of inventio as a taught search through stock argument-forms. Modern argumentation theory — the catalogue reappears as Perelman and Olbrechts-Tyteca's argumentation schemes in the New Rhetoric
Verification¶
Does it exist? Not checked yet. This entry carries no identifier to resolve. It was extracted from the citation as written in the article, normalized, and deduplicated against the rest of the registry.
Does it back the claim? Read against the text for 2 of 2 citations: 1 supported, 1 supported in part. Each verdict is shown under its citation below, with what in the work backs the sentence.
Support is checked per citation rather than per work — the same source can be cited soundly in one article and wrongly in another. Per-citation recording began recently, so a citation with no recorded check is a gap in the record rather than evidence it went unchecked.
See how references were verified.
Registry ID ref:5bab130e5f03 · see in the full table