Clinical progression and viral load in a community outbreak of coronavirus-associated SARS pneumonia¶
Peiris, J. S. M. (2003). Clinical progression and viral load in a community outbreak of coronavirus-associated SARS pneumonia: a prospective study. The Lancet.
Cited by¶
1 citation across 1 artifact.
Each citation links to the sentence it supports in the citing article.
Domain-specific¶
- Contact-Tracing Delay
- The reason tracing worked is structural: SARS transmission was low before symptom onset and peaked well into the symptomatic illness (viral load rising around the second week)
This sourceThe prospective community-outbreak study finding nasopharyngeal viral load peaking at day 10 of illness and falling by day 15 — the inverted V profile of SARS.
Supported in partVerified against a saved copy of the source
“showed peak viral load at day 10, and at day 15 a load lower than at admission”
- The reason tracing worked is structural: SARS transmission was low before symptom onset and peaked well into the symptomatic illness (viral load rising around the second week)
Verification¶
Does it exist? Not checked yet. This entry carries no identifier to resolve. It was extracted from the citation as written in the article, normalized, and deduplicated against the rest of the registry.
Does it back the claim? Read against the text for 1 of 1 citation: 1 supported in part. Each verdict is shown under its citation below, with what in the work backs the sentence.
Support is checked per citation rather than per work — the same source can be cited soundly in one article and wrongly in another. Per-citation recording began recently, so a citation with no recorded check is a gap in the record rather than evidence it went unchecked.
See how references were verified.
Registry ID ref:5efaed76d2ea · see in the full table