Skip to content

Über die Entropieverminderung in einem thermodynamischen System bei Eingriffen intelligenter Wesen.

Szilard, L. (1929). Über die Entropieverminderung in einem thermodynamischen System bei Eingriffen intelligenter Wesen. Zeitschrift für Physik, 53, 840-856.

Type
Journal article
Intellectual base
Primary research
Year
1929
Volume
53
Pages
840-856
DOI registrant
Springer Nature
Link
https://doi.org/10.1007/bf01341281matched
Cited from
physics

Cited by

1 citation across 1 artifact.

Each citation links to the sentence it supports in the citing article.

Primes

  • Second Law of Thermodynamics
    • Szilard's analysis

      This sourceShows that Maxwell demon's measurement unavoidably produces entropy; links information theory to thermodynamics; establishes that the demon must erase information; precursor to Landauer's principle; resolves Maxwell paradox.

      SupportedVerified against the publisher's abstract

      Szilard argues that a thermodynamic system in which measurements are made could show a lasting decrease in entropy, and so offend against the second law, “wenn nicht die Messungen selbst ihrerseits notwendig unter Entropieerzeugung vor sich gehen würden”, that is, unless the measurements themselves necessarily proceed with entropy production. He adds that the entropy produced in measurement need be no greater than compensation requires. That measurement-entropy link is the analysis the sentence invokes.

      “wenn nicht die Messungen selbst ihrerseits notwendig unter Entropieerzeugung vor sich gehen würden”

      From the publisher's abstract.

      Read by an automated reader; not a human review. How support was checked

Verification

Does it exist? Not checked yet. This entry carries no identifier to resolve. It was extracted from the citation as written in the article, normalized, and deduplicated against the rest of the registry.

Does it back the claim? Read against the text for 1 of 1 citation: 1 supported. Each verdict is shown under its citation below, with what in the work backs the sentence.

Support is checked per citation rather than per work — the same source can be cited soundly in one article and wrongly in another. Per-citation recording began recently, so a citation with no recorded check is a gap in the record rather than evidence it went unchecked.

See how references were verified.

Registry ID ref:613bc0f9c37d · see in the full table