National culture and human resource management: assumptions and evidence¶
Gerhart, & Fang. (2005). National culture and human resource management: assumptions and evidence: assumptions and evidence. The International Journal of Human Resource Management.
Cited by¶
1 citation across 1 artifact.
Each citation links to the sentence it supports in the citing article.
Domain-specific¶
- Intercultural Communication
- The label names a kind of situation, not a distinct structural force. Not solid trait measurement. The dimension scales (Hofstede's power-distance, individualism-collectivism, and the rest) are a modal first approximation bought by flattening within-culture variance — they predict the typical breakdown for a culture pair, not any individual's behavior, and weaken where within-culture spread exceeds between-culture spread
This sourceA re-analysis finding that country effects on values receive only weak support once judged by variance explained rather than significance testing.
Supported in partVerified against the publisher's abstract
“We find, contrary to the interpretations of the original authors, that these assumptions receive only weak support when country effects are evaluated using variance explained estimates, rather than relying solely on statistical significance tests.”
- The label names a kind of situation, not a distinct structural force. Not solid trait measurement. The dimension scales (Hofstede's power-distance, individualism-collectivism, and the rest) are a modal first approximation bought by flattening within-culture variance — they predict the typical breakdown for a culture pair, not any individual's behavior, and weaken where within-culture spread exceeds between-culture spread
Verification¶
Does it exist? Not checked yet. This work's DOI is recorded above but has not been resolved against an external catalogue, so nothing here confirms the work exists.
Does it back the claim? Read against the text for 1 of 1 citation: 1 supported in part. Each verdict is shown under its citation below, with what in the work backs the sentence.
Support is checked per citation rather than per work — the same source can be cited soundly in one article and wrongly in another. Per-citation recording began recently, so a citation with no recorded check is a gap in the record rather than evidence it went unchecked.
See how references were verified.
Registry ID ref:6146472d2eae · see in the full table