Eliciting Security Requirements with Misuse Cases.

Sindre, G., & Opdahl, A. L. (2005). Eliciting Security Requirements with Misuse Cases. Requirements Engineering, 10(1), 34-44.

Type

Journal article

Intellectual base

Primary research

Year

2005

Volume

10

Issue

1

Pages

34-44

DOI

10.1007/s00766-004-0194-4

DOI registrant

Springer Nature

Link

https://doi.org/10.1007/s00766-004-0194-4

Cited from

architecture_urban_planning

Cited by

1 citation across 1 artifact.

Primes

• Desire Path
  • and yield to the same reading procedure once it is extended to hostile use.

    Supported in partVerified against the publisher's abstract

    Abstract supports that use-case modelling can be extended to misuse; it does not cover desire paths, fraud trails, tax-evasion routes or exploit chains.

    “The approach extends traditional use cases to also cover misuse”

    Read by an automated reader; not a human review. How support was checked

Verification

Does it exist? Confirmed. This work's DOI resolves to a registered record, which fixes its identity. That is all it fixes.

Does it back the claim? Read against the text for 1 of 1 citation: 1 supported in part. Each verdict is shown under its citation below, with what in the work backs the sentence.

Support is checked per citation rather than per work — the same source can be cited soundly in one article and wrongly in another. Per-citation recording began recently, so a citation with no recorded check is a gap in the record rather than evidence it went unchecked.

See how references were verified.

Registry ID ref:61cd73a0dc82 · see in the full table