Unpacking the Court.

Kornhauser, L. A., & Sager, L. G. (1986). Unpacking the Court. Yale Law Journal, 96(1), 82-117.

Type

Journal article

Intellectual base

Primary research

Year

1986

DOI

10.2307/796436

Link

https://doi.org/10.2307/796436

Cited from

economics_finance

Cited by

1 citation across 1 artifact.

Each citation links to the sentence it supports in the citing article.

Primes

• Social Choice
  • Search and recommendation re-ranking: combining relevance, freshness, personalization, and diversity rankings into one is a social-choice problem in the rule choice. Judicial panels: multi-judge courts aggregate votes per case or per issue, and the choice of outcome-voting versus issue-voting is a social-choice question with a doctrinal-paradox literature.

    This sourceIdentifies the doctrinal paradox — outcome-voting versus issue-voting on multi-judge panels can yield different verdicts from the same judges — as a social-choice problem.

Verification

This reference passed the adversarial substantiation pipeline: it was checked to exist and to support the claim it is attached to. See how references were verified.

Registry ID ref:61ddb695320b · see in the full table