Digital Justice¶
Katsh, E., & Rabinovich-Einy, O. (2017). Digital Justice: Technology and the Internet of Disputes. Oxford University Press.
Cited by¶
1 citation across 1 artifact.
Each citation links to the sentence it supports in the citing article.
Primes¶
- Adjudication (Dispute Resolution)
- Online platforms use community guidelines (uniform rules) but permit appeals to a human reviewer (case-specific fairness override), a hybrid Katsh and Rabinovich-Einy (2017) trace through the evolution of online dispute resolution as it scales algorithmic uniformity with selective human override.
This sourceAnalyzes how platform-scale online dispute resolution combines algorithmic uniform-rule application with selective human-override appeals — supports the uniformity-vs-case-fairness archetype (D49-012).
- Online platforms use community guidelines (uniform rules) but permit appeals to a human reviewer (case-specific fairness override), a hybrid Katsh and Rabinovich-Einy (2017) trace through the evolution of online dispute resolution as it scales algorithmic uniformity with selective human override.
Verification¶
Does it exist? Not checked yet. This entry carries no identifier to resolve. It was extracted from the citation as written in the article, normalized, and deduplicated against the rest of the registry.
Does it back the claim? Not recorded. The single citation of this work carries no recorded support check.
Support is checked per citation rather than per work — the same source can be cited soundly in one article and wrongly in another. Per-citation recording began recently, so a citation with no recorded check is a gap in the record rather than evidence it went unchecked.
See how references were verified.
Registry ID ref:625b79ca4bb9 · see in the full table