New Jersey's holding that a cross-racial identification instruction is required where identification is critical and uncorroborated

State v. Cromedy, 1. N. J. 1. (1999). New Jersey's holding that a cross-racial identification instruction is required where identification is critical and uncorroborated.

Type

Unclassified

Intellectual base

Unclassified

Year

1999

Link

no authoritative link yet

Cited by

1 citation across 1 artifact.

Domain-specific

• Cross-Race Effect
  • Face perception and recognition memory — the home turf: own-group faces individuated finely and out-group faces coded categorically, with the asymmetry generalizing beyond race to other-age and own-species biases via the identical exposure-tuning logic. Eyewitness identification and the law — cross-race misidentification as the same encoding deficit at high stakes, codified in some jurisdictions as required jury instructions about own-race bias

    Supported in partVerified against the source

    Read by an automated reader; not a human review. How support was checked

Verification

Does it exist? Not checked yet. This entry carries no identifier to resolve. It was extracted from the citation as written in the article, normalized, and deduplicated against the rest of the registry.

Does it back the claim? Read against the text for 1 of 1 citation: 1 supported in part. Each verdict is shown under its citation below, with what in the work backs the sentence.

Support is checked per citation rather than per work — the same source can be cited soundly in one article and wrongly in another. Per-citation recording began recently, so a citation with no recorded check is a gap in the record rather than evidence it went unchecked.

See how references were verified.

Registry ID ref:62ceb14d03e3 · see in the full table