The effect of testing versus restudy on retention¶
Rowland. (2014). The effect of testing versus restudy on retention: A meta-analytic review of the testing effect.
Cited by¶
1 citation across 1 artifact.
Each citation links to the sentence it supports in the citing article.
Domain-specific¶
- Retrieval Practice
- Henry Roediger and Jeffrey Karpicke's 2006 studies and the subsequent meta-analytic literature across hundreds of experiments establish this as one of the most robustly replicated effects in the cognitive psychology of learning
This sourceA meta-analysis of testing-versus-restudy experiments finding a benefit of testing over restudy, larger after recall tests than after recognition tests.
Supported in partVerified against the source
- Henry Roediger and Jeffrey Karpicke's 2006 studies and the subsequent meta-analytic literature across hundreds of experiments establish this as one of the most robustly replicated effects in the cognitive psychology of learning
Verification¶
Does it exist? Not checked yet. This work's DOI is recorded above but has not been resolved against an external catalogue, so nothing here confirms the work exists.
Does it back the claim? Read against the text for 1 of 1 citation: 1 supported in part. Each verdict is shown under its citation below, with what in the work backs the sentence.
Support is checked per citation rather than per work — the same source can be cited soundly in one article and wrongly in another. Per-citation recording began recently, so a citation with no recorded check is a gap in the record rather than evidence it went unchecked.
See how references were verified.
Registry ID ref:63c7b9509895 · see in the full table