2013 Supplement to the 2006 IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories¶
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. (2013). 2013 Supplement to the 2006 IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories: Wetlands.
Cited by¶
2 citations across 2 artifacts.
Each citation links to the sentence it supports in the citing article.
Domain-specific¶
- Blue Carbon
- This vulnerability profile — high long-term storage, rapid reversal on disturbance — is what makes blue-carbon ecosystems both high-leverage climate interventions when preserved and high-risk carbon sources when degraded, and it is this combination that gives "blue carbon" its operational meaning in greenhouse-gas inventory accounting (IPCC Wetlands Supplement 2013)
This sourceThe IPCC methodology supplement whose Chapter 4, Coastal Wetlands, extends national greenhouse-gas inventory coverage to mangrove forests, tidal marshes and seagrass meadows.
Supported in partVerified against a saved copy of the source
“coastal wetlands including mangrove forests, tidal marshes and seagrass meadows and constructed wetlands for wastewater treatment”
- This vulnerability profile — high long-term storage, rapid reversal on disturbance — is what makes blue-carbon ecosystems both high-leverage climate interventions when preserved and high-risk carbon sources when degraded, and it is this combination that gives "blue carbon" its operational meaning in greenhouse-gas inventory accounting (IPCC Wetlands Supplement 2013)
- Carbon Source
- National greenhouse-gas inventories and REDD+ accounting now track these landscapes precisely by their net flux
Supported in partVerified against a saved copy of the source
“extends the content of the 2006 IPCC Guidelines by filling gaps in coverage and providing updated information reflecting scientific advances, including updating emission factors”
- National greenhouse-gas inventories and REDD+ accounting now track these landscapes precisely by their net flux
Verification¶
Does it exist? Not checked yet. This entry carries no identifier to resolve. It was extracted from the citation as written in the article, normalized, and deduplicated against the rest of the registry.
Does it back the claim? Read against the text for 2 of 2 citations: 2 supported in part. Each verdict is shown under its citation below, with what in the work backs the sentence.
Support is checked per citation rather than per work — the same source can be cited soundly in one article and wrongly in another. Per-citation recording began recently, so a citation with no recorded check is a gap in the record rather than evidence it went unchecked.
See how references were verified.
Registry ID ref:6404468d62ce · see in the full table