Quantisierung als Eigenwertproblem (Dritte Mitteilung).¶
Schrödinger, E. (1926). Quantisierung als Eigenwertproblem (Dritte Mitteilung). Annalen der Physik, 80(5), 437-490.
Cited by¶
7 citations across 6 artifacts.
Each citation links to the sentence it supports in the citing article.
Primes¶
- Correspondence Principle
- A correspondence principle applied too rigidly (as "no new physics where the old theory worked") would have vetoed such predictions.
This sourceDevelops the Rayleigh-Schrödinger perturbation method for quantum mechanics; derives first-order corrections to energy and wavefunctions using unperturbed eigenstates and matrix elements.
- This subtlety is crucial: correspondence is about empirical validation, not about philosophical completeness.
This sourceDevelops Rayleigh–Schrödinger perturbation theory in wave mechanics. NON-SUPPORTING for the T3 claim it is cited on (that overly rigid correspondence would have vetoed new phenomena such as macroscopic tunneling and gravitational waves); the paper is about perturbative eigenvalue corrections, not the conservative-bias critique of the correspondence principle.
- A correspondence principle applied too rigidly (as "no new physics where the old theory worked") would have vetoed such predictions.
- Discrete vs. Continuous (Quantization)
- The distinction between the bound-state vs scattering-state distinction is foundational: bound states have discrete energy eigenvalues; scattering states form a continuum.
This sourceFormulates quantization as an eigenvalue problem: solving the wave equation yields a discrete set of allowed energy eigenvalues for bound systems and a continuum for scattering states — directly supports the eigenvalue-spectrum / boundary-condition origin of discreteness, the bound-vs-scattering split, and the hydrogen energy levels.
- The distinction between the bound-state vs scattering-state distinction is foundational: bound states have discrete energy eigenvalues; scattering states form a continuum.
- Perturbation Theory
- Experimentally measured to fractional accuracy < 10⁻⁶ in Rydberg-series studies, the theoretical value is the second-order perturbation calculation, with higher-order corrections negligible for field strengths below ~10⁹ V/m (where tunneling ionization takes over — a non-perturbative breakdown).
This sourceDevelops the Rayleigh-Schrödinger perturbation method for quantum mechanics; derives first-order corrections to energy and wavefunctions using unperturbed eigenstates and matrix elements.
- Experimentally measured to fractional accuracy < 10⁻⁶ in Rydberg-series studies, the theoretical value is the second-order perturbation calculation, with higher-order corrections negligible for field strengths below ~10⁹ V/m (where tunneling ionization takes over — a non-perturbative breakdown).
- Superposition
This sourceDerives the Schrödinger wave equation as the fundamental equation of quantum mechanics; treats matter as probability amplitudes propagating via a wave equation; unifies de Broglie waves with quantum mechanics.
- Wave
- Schrödinger's 1926 wave equation
This sourceDerives the Schrödinger wave equation as the fundamental equation of quantum mechanics; treats matter as probability amplitudes propagating via a wave equation; unifies de Broglie waves with quantum mechanics.
- Schrödinger's 1926 wave equation
Domain-specific¶
Verification¶
This reference passed the adversarial substantiation pipeline: it was checked to exist and to support the claim it is attached to. See how references were verified.
Links previously used in the corpus¶
Before the registry existed this work was also linked 1 other way.
Registry ID ref:666fe72bf151 · see in the full table