(untitled)¶
United States v. Aluminum Co. of America, 1. F. 2. 4. J. L. H. 1. S. C. o. i. t. A. m. c. (1945). (untitled).
Cited by¶
1 citation across 1 artifact.
Each citation links to the sentence it supports in the citing article.
Domain-specific¶
- Barrier to Entry
- The opinion itself never uses the word "barrier"; on the modern reading, though, the durability of that position is traced to two sources rather than to the mere fact of dominance
This sourceJudge Hand's opinion, which nowhere uses the language of entry barriers and turns instead on whether the monopoly was thrust upon Alcoa, while supplying both record findings the modern reading draws on - control of bauxite and low-cost power, which the court found not in excess of legitimate needs, and new capacity built ahead of demand to meet every entrant.
- The opinion itself never uses the word "barrier"; on the modern reading, though, the durability of that position is traced to two sources rather than to the mere fact of dominance
Verification¶
This reference passed the adversarial substantiation pipeline: it was checked to exist and to support the claim it is attached to. See how references were verified.
Registry ID ref:687d1c3ad121 · see in the full table