Report of the NOAA Panel on Contingent Valuation¶
Arrow, K. (1993). Report of the NOAA Panel on Contingent Valuation.
Cited by¶
1 citation across 1 artifact.
Domain-specific¶
- Scope Neglect
- Surveys for protecting a species or watershed routinely fail the scope test (that willingness to pay rises with the quantity of the good); embedding (valuing "all the lakes" barely above "this lake") was the worry the NOAA Blue Ribbon Panel forced on the field, and scope sensitivity became its own validity criterion
SupportedVerified against the source
- Surveys for protecting a species or watershed routinely fail the scope test (that willingness to pay rises with the quantity of the good); embedding (valuing "all the lakes" barely above "this lake") was the worry the NOAA Blue Ribbon Panel forced on the field, and scope sensitivity became its own validity criterion
Verification¶
Does it exist? Not checked yet. This entry carries no identifier to resolve. It was extracted from the citation as written in the article, normalized, and deduplicated against the rest of the registry.
Does it back the claim? Read against the text for 1 of 1 citation: 1 supported. Each verdict is shown under its citation below, with what in the work backs the sentence.
Support is checked per citation rather than per work — the same source can be cited soundly in one article and wrongly in another. Per-citation recording began recently, so a citation with no recorded check is a gap in the record rather than evidence it went unchecked.
See how references were verified.
Registry ID ref:68eef5b7240b · see in the full table