Testimony¶
Coady, C. A. J. (1992). Testimony: A Philosophical Study. Clarendon Press.
Cited by¶
1 citation across 1 artifact.
Each citation links to the sentence it supports in the citing article.
Primes¶
- Primary vs. Secondary Sources
- The epistemic stakes are the same as those Coady (1992) develops in his philosophical analysis of testimony: derivative knowledge through reports remains warranted only as long as the chain back to direct witnesses is preserved and inspectable.
This sourcePhilosophical analysis of testimony as a source of knowledge; argues that derivative knowledge through reports remains warranted only as long as the chain back to direct witnesses is preserved and inspectable.
- The epistemic stakes are the same as those Coady (1992) develops in his philosophical analysis of testimony: derivative knowledge through reports remains warranted only as long as the chain back to direct witnesses is preserved and inspectable.
Verification¶
Does it exist? Not checked yet. This entry carries no identifier to resolve. It was extracted from the citation as written in the article, normalized, and deduplicated against the rest of the registry.
Does it back the claim? Not recorded. The single citation of this work carries no recorded support check.
Support is checked per citation rather than per work — the same source can be cited soundly in one article and wrongly in another. Per-citation recording began recently, so a citation with no recorded check is a gap in the record rather than evidence it went unchecked.
See how references were verified.
Registry ID ref:690b41666b94 · see in the full table