Testimony¶
Coady, C. A. J. (1992). Testimony: A Philosophical Study. Clarendon Press.
Cited by¶
1 citation across 1 artifact.
Each citation links to the sentence it supports in the citing article.
Primes¶
- Primary vs. Secondary Sources
- The epistemic stakes are the same as those Coady (1992) develops in his philosophical analysis of testimony: derivative knowledge through reports remains warranted only as long as the chain back to direct witnesses is preserved and inspectable.
This sourcePhilosophical analysis of testimony as a source of knowledge; argues that derivative knowledge through reports remains warranted only as long as the chain back to direct witnesses is preserved and inspectable.
- The epistemic stakes are the same as those Coady (1992) develops in his philosophical analysis of testimony: derivative knowledge through reports remains warranted only as long as the chain back to direct witnesses is preserved and inspectable.
Verification¶
This reference passed the adversarial substantiation pipeline: it was checked to exist and to support the claim it is attached to. See how references were verified.
Registry ID ref:690b41666b94 · see in the full table