Federal Rules of Evidence, Rule 702¶
Federal Rules of Evidence, Rule 702. Federal Rules of Evidence.
Cited by¶
1 citation across 1 artifact.
Domain-specific¶
- Fieldnote Backfill
- The practice is reinforced legally: a record made while events were fresh in the witness's memory can be admitted as recorded recollection when the witness can no longer recall the matter well enough to testify (the "past recollection recorded" doctrine), a route a later reconstruction does not qualify for
SupportedVerified against the source
- The practice is reinforced legally: a record made while events were fresh in the witness's memory can be admitted as recorded recollection when the witness can no longer recall the matter well enough to testify (the "past recollection recorded" doctrine), a route a later reconstruction does not qualify for
Verification¶
Does it exist? Not checked yet. This entry carries no identifier to resolve. It was extracted from the citation as written in the article, normalized, and deduplicated against the rest of the registry.
Does it back the claim? Read against the text for 1 of 1 citation: 1 supported. Each verdict is shown under its citation below, with what in the work backs the sentence.
Was it audited? Yes. A second, independent pass read the citation against the article text and recorded a verdict.
Support is checked per citation rather than per work — the same source can be cited soundly in one article and wrongly in another. Per-citation recording began recently, so a citation with no recorded check is a gap in the record rather than evidence it went unchecked.
See how references were verified.
Registry ID ref:6ac80dee48b4 · see in the full table