Hydrodynamica, sive de viribus et motibus fluidorum commentarii

Bernoulli, D. (1738). Hydrodynamica, sive de viribus et motibus fluidorum commentarii.

Type

Dataset

Intellectual base

Primary research

Year

1738

Link

https://archive.org/details/hydrodynamicasiv00bern

Cited from

behavioral_economics, economics_finance, physics

Cited by

4 citations across 4 artifacts.

Each citation links to the sentence it supports in the citing article.

Primes

• Flow
  • The mathematical foundations of fluid flow rest on the balance between Pressure and Inertia, formalized by

    This sourceEstablishes the principle of energy conservation in fluid flow; the inverse relation of pressure and velocity (Bernoulli's principle, ch. 12). By multiple sources that Hydrodynamica (1738) introduced the pressure-velocity relation; the book christened the field 'hydrodynamics.'

• Loss Aversion
  • Bernoulli (1738)

    This sourceEstablishes the principle of energy conservation in fluid flow: pressure and kinetic energy are inversely related. Bernoulli's equation (P + ½ρv² + ρgh = const along streamline) remains the foundation for steady, incompressible flow analysis across engineering and physics.

• Marginal Utility
  • Additional cross-G candidates include Bernoulli 1738

    This sourceEstablishes the principle of energy conservation in fluid flow: pressure and kinetic energy are inversely related. Bernoulli's equation (P + ½ρv² + ρgh = const along streamline) remains the foundation for steady, incompressible flow analysis across engineering and physics.

• Risk–Return Tradeoff
  • 1738

    This sourceEstablishes the principle of energy conservation in fluid flow: pressure and kinetic energy are inversely related. Bernoulli's equation (P + ½ρv² + ρgh = const along streamline) remains the foundation for steady, incompressible flow analysis across engineering and physics.

Verification

Does it exist? Not checked yet. This entry carries no identifier to resolve. It was extracted from the citation as written in the article, normalized, and deduplicated against the rest of the registry.

Does it back the claim? Not recorded. Neither this nor any other of the 4 citations of this work carries a recorded support check.

Support is checked per citation rather than per work — the same source can be cited soundly in one article and wrongly in another. Per-citation recording began recently, so a citation with no recorded check is a gap in the record rather than evidence it went unchecked.

See how references were verified.

Registry ID ref:6b0348136c7c · see in the full table