Depth of Processing and the Retention of Words in Episodic Memory¶
Craik, F. I. M., & Tulving, E. (1975). Depth of Processing and the Retention of Words in Episodic Memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 104(3), 268-294.
Cited by¶
2 citations across 2 artifacts.
Each citation links to the sentence it supports in the citing article.
Domain-specific¶
- Elaborative Encoding
- Levels of Processing supplies an ordered task contrast and the finding that semantic operations outperform structural and phonemic ones
This sourceThe ten-experiment orienting-task series establishing that semantic (sentence-frame) judgements yield better retention than phonemic (rhyme) and structural (case) judgements.
SupportedVerified against the source
- Levels of Processing supplies an ordered task contrast and the finding that semantic operations outperform structural and phonemic ones
- Transfer-Appropriate Processing
- TAP asks whether the later test recruits what was processed and permits a shallower operation to win when the test is built around it.
This sourcePrimary experimental development of the levels-of-processing benchmark against which the canonical TAP reversal is interpreted.
- TAP asks whether the later test recruits what was processed and permits a shallower operation to win when the test is built around it.
Verification¶
Does it exist? Confirmed. This work's DOI resolves to a registered record, which fixes its identity. That is all it fixes.
Does it back the claim? Read against the text for 1 of 2 citations: 1 supported. Each verdict is shown under its citation below, with what in the work backs the sentence.
Support is checked per citation rather than per work — the same source can be cited soundly in one article and wrongly in another. Per-citation recording began recently, so a citation with no recorded check is a gap in the record rather than evidence it went unchecked.
See how references were verified.
Registry ID ref:6b1757bc50e9 · see in the full table