Skip to content

Attention, Uncertainty, and Free-Energy.

Feldman, H., & Friston, K. J. (2010). Attention, Uncertainty, and Free-Energy. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 4.

Type
Journal article
Intellectual base
Primary research
Year
2010
Volume
4
DOI
10.3389/fnhum.2010.00215
DOI registrant
Frontiers Media SA
Link
https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2010.00215
Cited from
cognitive_science

Cited by

2 citations across 2 artifacts.

Each citation links to the sentence it supports in the citing article.

Primes

  • Precision Weighting
    • In neural predictive processing the brain is hypothesized to weight prediction errors by context-estimated precision, with attention as one modulation mechanism.

      This sourceModels attention as inferring and weighting by the precision of prediction errors in predictive processing.

      Supported in partVerified against the work's full text

      Feldman and Friston hold that optimal inference “involves weighting data in proportion to their estimated precision”, with prediction error standing in for sensory data in predictive coding and the weighting implemented by synaptic gain. They tie this to attentional gain, where the responsiveness of prediction-error units “is modulated by attentional mechanisms”. That pairing of precision-weighted prediction error with attention as a gain mechanism is the hypothesis the sentence reports. The passage speaks of estimated precision without saying what the estimate is derived from, so the sentence's context-estimated qualifier goes beyond it.

      “it may be the case that attention is the process of optimizing synaptic gain to represent the precision of sensory information (prediction error) during hierarchical inference.”

      From the work's full text.

      Read by an automated reader; not a human review. How support was checked

Mechanisms

Verification

Does it exist? Confirmed. This work's DOI resolves to a registered record, which fixes its identity. That is all it fixes.

Does it back the claim? Read against the text for 1 of 2 citations: 1 supported in part. Each verdict is shown under its citation below, with what in the work backs the sentence.

Support is checked per citation rather than per work — the same source can be cited soundly in one article and wrongly in another. Per-citation recording began recently, so a citation with no recorded check is a gap in the record rather than evidence it went unchecked.

See how references were verified.

Registry ID ref:6b96fe141def · see in the full table