The causal logic of critical junctures¶
Soifer, H. D. (2012). The causal logic of critical junctures. Comparative Political Studies, 45(12), 1572-1597.
Cited by¶
1 citation across 1 artifact.
Each citation links to the sentence it supports in the citing article.
Primes¶
- Critical Juncture
- This clarity redirects attention: practitioners asking "Which decisions are actually critical?" are forced to examine lock-in mechanisms, increasing returns, and path-dependent dynamics, distinctions Soifer (2012) sharpens by separating permissive from productive conditions in critical junctures.
This sourceDistinguishes permissive conditions (which open the window of high sensitivity) from productive conditions (which determine divergent outcomes), sharpening the critical-vs-routine distinction; directly supports the Clarity claim.
Supported in partVerified against the publisher's abstract
Soifer's own abstract states the permissive/productive distinction, but says nothing about lock-in mechanisms, increasing returns, or path-dependent dynamics, so it backs only the second half of the sentence.
“This article proposes a distinction between permissive and productive conditions in critical junctures. Permissive conditions are necessary conditions that mark the loosening of constraints on agency or contingency and thus provide the temporal bounds on critical junctures. Productive conditions, which can take various logical forms, act within the context of these permissive conditions to produce divergence.”
- This clarity redirects attention: practitioners asking "Which decisions are actually critical?" are forced to examine lock-in mechanisms, increasing returns, and path-dependent dynamics, distinctions Soifer (2012) sharpens by separating permissive from productive conditions in critical junctures.
Verification¶
Does it exist? Confirmed. This work's DOI resolves to a registered record, which fixes its identity. That is all it fixes.
Does it back the claim? Read against the text for 1 of 1 citation: 1 supported in part. Each verdict is shown under its citation below, with what in the work backs the sentence.
Support is checked per citation rather than per work — the same source can be cited soundly in one article and wrongly in another. Per-citation recording began recently, so a citation with no recorded check is a gap in the record rather than evidence it went unchecked.
See how references were verified.
Registry ID ref:6baf0532414c · see in the full table